Next Generation Research in Dialogic Learning
Lauren Β. Resnick, Christa S. C. Asterhan, Sherice N. Clarke, Faith Schantz
University of Pittsburgh Hebrew University of Jerusalem University of California San Diego
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This chapter looks briefly at how language, specifically dialogic talk, came to influence theories of learning. It considers a sampling of the evidence on the effects of dialogic teaching and learning. The chapter proposes a range of possible explanations for these effects, from several perspectives. Accountable Talk is named because its critical features fall under three broad dimensions: accountability to reasoning, accountability to knowledge, and accountability to the learning community. Dialogic learning involves a shift in pedagogical thinking from valuing an inert, correctly stated “right answer” to valuing the thinking process, even if this entails considerable struggle. Testing plays an increasingly important role in schools, with two or even three rounds of diagnostic testing, weeks of state test administration, and months spent on test preparation. Finally, the chapter speculates on why dialogic teaching has not become widespread, and suggests next steps for both practice and research.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Education and Critical Thinking Development · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
参考文献 72
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 96
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条