Developing teacher professional capital: A case study of Master Teacher Studios in Zhejiang province, China
Meng Zhang, Haiyan Qian, Allan Walker
South China Normal University Chinese University of Hong Kong Education University of Hong Kong
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The concept of ‘professional capital’, which consists of human, social, and decisional capital, has been adopted in many countries to guide teacher development and school practice. However, more empirical research needs to be conducted to understand the concept in the Chinese context. The study investigates how teachers accumulate their professional capital in Master Teacher Studios (MTSs), a cross‐school teacher professional learning community in China. The study adopts a qualitative case study approach. Interviews, observation, and document analysis were employed to collect data from 10 MTSs in Zhejiang province, China. Ten MTS hosts and 28 studio members were selected as research participants. A combination of inductive and deductive coding approaches helped identify specific practices related to the three components of professional capital. Teachers in MTSs develop their human capital with increased professional competence, professional achievements and reputations, as well as enhanced confidence and open mindsets. Regarding social capital, teachers benefit from harmonious interpersonal relationships within MTSs to win peer support, from stronger social ties to learn from experts, and access more visible opportunities to display themselves professionally. They also enhance their decisional capital in the critical areas of teaching research (jiaoyan) and leadership issues. The study reveals specific practices associated with professional capital in the Chinese context where interpersonal relationships (guanxi) and cooperation are particularly emphasised, contributing to theory development. The study also describes how teacher leaders contribute to developing teacher professional capital, which may contribute to understanding teacher‐led professional learning.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Teacher Professional Development and Motivation · Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
参考文献 49
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 10
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条