Treatment for comorbid depressive disorder or subthreshold depression in diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
Christina Maria Van Der Feltz-Cornelis, Sarah F. Allen, Richard I. G. Holt, Richard Roberts, Arie Nouwen, Norman Sartorius
University of York Hull York Medical School University of Southampton University of Wisconsin–Madison
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Objective To provide an estimate of the effect of interventions on comorbid depressive disorder (MDD) or subthreshold depression in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Methods Systematic review and meta‐analysis. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials evaluating the outcome of depression treatments in diabetes and comorbid MDD or subthreshold symptoms published before August 2019 compared to care as usual (CAU), placebo, waiting list (WL), or active comparator treatment as in a comparative effectiveness trial (CET). Primary outcomes were depressive symptom severity and glycemic control. Cohen's d is reported. Results Forty‐three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected, and 32 RCTs comprising 3,543 patients were included in the meta‐analysis. Our meta‐analysis showed that, compared to CAU, placebo or WL, all interventions showed a significant effect on combined outcome 0,485 (95% CI 0.360; 0.609). All interventions showed a significant effect on depression. Pharmacological treatment, group therapy, psychotherapy, and collaborative care had a significant effect on glycemic control. High baseline depression score was associated with a greater reduction in HbA 1 c and depressive outcome. High baseline HbA 1 c was associated with a greater reduction in HbA 1 c. Conclusion All treatments are effective for comorbid depression in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Over the last decade, new interventions with large effect sizes have been introduced, such as group‐based therapy, online treatment, and exercise. Although all interventions were effective for depression, not all treatments were effective for glycemic control. Effective interventions in comorbid depressive disorder may not be as effective in comorbid subthreshold depression. Baseline depression and HbA 1 c scores modify the treatment effect. Based on the findings, we provide guidance for treatment depending on patient profile and desired outcome, and discuss possible avenues for further research.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Diabetes Management and Education
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Mental Health Treatment and Access
参考文献 102
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 129
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条