Combating ESG Greenwashing Through AI Models: Evidence From Disaggregated AI Technologies, Mechanisms, and Thresholds
Brahim Bergougui, Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany, Abdulrahman Atllah Alharbi
National Higher School of Statistics and Applied Economy International Institute of Social Studies Qatar University Erasmus University Rotterdam
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This study examines how artificial intelligence language models influence corporate environmental, social, and governance greenwashing () behavior, utilizing panel data from Chinese listed firms spanning 2012–2022. We investigate the mechanisms, technological disaggregation, threshold dynamics, and contextual heterogeneity characterizing this relationship. Employing a large language model to construct refined measures of AI adoption, our empirical analysis yields four principal findings. First, AI language models reduce . Second, technological disaggregation demonstrates substantial heterogeneity across AI subfields: machine learning and planning‐decision systems exert the strongest constraining effects on , while other AI categories show limited influence. Third, mechanism analysis reveals that AI constrains through two primary transmission channels, workforce skill restructuring and firm performance enhancement. Fourth, threshold regression analysis reveals critical nonlinearities: the AI– GW ESG relationship exhibits structural shifts contingent upon environmental regulation intensity and green technology sophistication. Fifth, subsample analysis stratified by pollution intensity, ownership structure, and technological orientation shows that AI's deterrent effect intensifies among heavily polluting enterprises, non‐state‐owned firms, and technology‐intensive sectors—contexts where disclosure credibility faces maximum scrutiny and organizational absorptive capacity enables effective AI integration. These findings suggest that recognizing AI's potential for environmental governance requires coordinated policy interventions: promoting AI deployment in environmentally critical domains, strengthening regulatory frameworks that leverage AI's analytical capabilities, investing in complementary human capital and digital infrastructure, and designing differentiated support mechanisms calibrated to firm heterogeneity. Firms can leverage on Ai models to boost transparency and Accountability of ESG reporting. Regulators and policymakers can investigate developing guidelines on the usage of AI technology to curb ESG greenwashing and improve sustainable practices.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Environmental Sustainability in Business
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
参考文献 83
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 3
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条