Risks and Harms of Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI) Chatbot Use Among US Youth
Sameer Hinduja, Justin W. Patchin
Florida Atlantic University University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Introduction Conversational AI (CAI) chatbots are widely used by adolescents for instruction, entertainment, companionship, and advice, but concerns persist that they may foster risky behaviors, spread harmful content, and elevate psychological risks. Given the limited research base, this study examined CAI chatbot use, motivations, and negative or unsafe experiences among US youth. Methods An anonymous online survey was administered to a nationally representative sample of 3466 US youth aged 13–17. Respondents reported frequency and intensity of CAI chatbot use, reasons for engagement, and experiences with harmful chatbot behaviors including dishonesty, pressure to reveal secrets, unsafe requests, inappropriate conversations, manipulation, misinformation, and promotion of self‐harm or violence (with group differences assessed via χ 2 tests). Results Over 60% of the sample reported using a CAI chatbot, with 11.4% doing so every day or nearly every day. Main reasons included entertainment (85%), friendship (60.1%), and advice (65.6%). Still, 32.3% were asked for uncomfortable personal information, 23.1% felt manipulated or pressured, 17.1% received false information, 18.7% were encouraged to act unethically or illegally, 15.2% were prompted to risky behaviors, and 14.7% and 13.0% were exposed to self‐harm and suicidal messages, respectively. Male, heterosexual, white, and younger (13‐year‐old) youth reported higher rates of most negative experiences. Conclusions CAI chatbot usage is common among US adolescents, with 47.1% reporting exposure to one or more specific risks and harms. These findings highlight the need for adaptive safety features, ongoing monitoring systems, and safeguards that promote the psychological and social well‐being of youth while addressing their developmental vulnerabilities.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Social Robot Interaction and HRI
参考文献 29
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 7
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条