Artificial Intelligence Assisted Creativity: Conceptualization, Instrument Development and Validation
Pui Yi Mok, Hsueh‐Hua Chuang, Ming‐Min Cheng, Thomas J. Smith
National Sun Yat-sen University Purdue University West Lafayette Northern Illinois University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Considering the pivotal role of creativity across various eras and the rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in both creative processes and education, this study introduces and provides validity evidence for the AI‐assisted Creativity Questionnaire (AICQ). This new 16‐item instrument aims to quantify human creative potential in AI‐assisted endeavors. Initially, a diverse cohort of 322 university students in Taiwan completed the AICQ from November to December 2023. Through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of responses from this sample, three distinct factors emerged: (1) AI‐assisted functional creativity (AIFC), (2) AI‐assisted visual artistic creativity (AIVAC), and (3) AI‐assisted ideational creativity (AIIC). One item was removed due to cross‐loading. Subsequently, in September 2024, 330 university students in Taiwan engaged with both the AICQ and the 28‐item Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI). Based on responses from this sample, construct validity evidence for the AICQ was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), which affirmed that a three‐factor model provided a good fit to the data. Gender differences in AICQ scores were found in these subsequent data. Overall, data from participants provided evidence for the reliability as well as convergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity of the scores obtained from the AICQ.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Sport Psychology and Performance
参考文献 99
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 9
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条