AI‐Driven Synthesis in Medicinal Chemistry: Integrating Large Language Models, Robotic Automation, and Sustainability Metrics to Accelerate Drug Discovery
Amit Gangwal, Antonio Lavecchia
Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies Federico II University Hospital
内容与影响
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming synthetic chemistry from task-specific predictors into integrated platforms that unify retrosynthesis, reaction optimization, and closed-loop robotic automation. This review highlights how AI-assisted planning and robotic execution shorten cycle times, reduce step counts, and improve route sustainability in medicinal chemistry. Recent advances, including large language models (LLMs), template-free retrosynthesis, and Bayesian optimization, are evaluated alongside key limitations in dataset quality, reproducibility, and deployment costs. To ensure translational relevance, reproducible benchmarks such as step count, time-to-in vitro, and green metrics (E-factor, process mass intensity) are emphasized. This review proposes a hierarchical framework structured across three interconnected levels: cognitive planning, physical execution, and translational evaluation. Within this structure, key elements include LLM-based synthesis planning, robotic and closed-loop execution, interpretable decision-making, sustainability-by-design, advanced reaction optimization, and multi-objective retrosynthesis. Together, these components provide a conceptual basis for integrating digital intelligence with physical experimentation. By embedding green chemistry principles and regulatory awareness, AI is increasingly positioned not only as a predictive tool but also as an assistive collaborator supporting decision-making in medicinal chemistry workflows. The convergence of AI, robotics, and sustainability metrics highlights an emerging transition; however, realizing a future where every experiment reliably feeds back into autonomous learning loops requires overcoming significant current barriers in data standardization and hardware interoperability.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
回答优先基于摘要、文献信息与可获取全文;依据不足时会明确说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
材料 / 化学Machine Learning in Materials Science
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
参考文献 106
此处列出前 3 条