Interfacial Spacing Tunes π–d Charge Transfer to Co‐Optimize Conductivity and Strength in Cu–Graphene Composites
Yaling Huang, Youming Luo, Yucan Lei, Zichao Zhao, Quanfang Chen
Southwest Jiaotong University South China University of Technology
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Simultaneously enhancing electrical conductivity and tensile strength in copper–graphene composites remains challenging because microstructural strategies that strengthen the metal typically impede carrier transport. Here we establish a spacing‐controlled interfacial mechanism: at a Cu–graphene gap of ∼2.5 Å, the interface forms a metallocovalent π–d charge‐transfer bond in which graphene's C‐2p z orbital hybridizes with Cu‐3d (a “doorway” covalency) while Cu‐4s/4p states donate charges into the graphene's π manifold. Density‐functional theory combined with nonequilibrium Green's functions (DFT+NEGF) shows that the spacing pins a hybrid interfacial resonance near the Fermi level and maximizes electrode coupling (lead broadenings), producing a peak in the transmission at E F , T(E F ). The same hybridization stabilizes occupied bonding states, generating a co‐peak in the work of separation, Wsep. Projected density of states and Mulliken analysis further reveal a maximum Cu→C charge transfer at ∼2.5 Å, with C‐2p gain balanced by Cu‐4s/4p depletion. Experiments on pressure‐sintered Cu–graphene validate this mechanism, delivering 128% IACS conductivity (vs. ∼100% IACS for identically processed Cu) together with a tensile strength of 589 MPa at 0.4 wt.% graphene addition. These results identify interfacial spacing as a prescriptive knob that simultaneously optimizes transport and adhesion, enabling copper–graphene composites that are both stronger and more conductive.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Graphene research and applications · Thermal properties of materials
参考文献 40
此处列出前 3 条