Exploring Large Language Model‐Based Intelligent Agents: Definitions, Methods, and Prospects
Yuheng Cheng, Ceyao Zhang, Zhengwen Zhang, Xiangrui Meng, Sirui Hong, Wenhao Li, Zihao Wang, Zekai Wang 等 11 位
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Peking University Tongji University Shenzhen Technology University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The concept of the intelligent agent represents a long‐standing pursuit in artificial intelligence. Recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed a paradigm shift, enabling the development of sophisticated agents that exhibit advanced reasoning, planning, and tool‐use capabilities across diverse domains. These LLM‐based agents, which leverage natural language as a universal interface for cognition and interaction, are rapidly advancing from theoretical constructs to practical applications, ranging from autonomous task assistants to complex multi‐agent simulations of social and economic systems. This paper provides an integrative survey of this burgeoning field. We first establish an organizing framework for understanding LLM‐based agents, systematically deconstructing both single‐agent and multi‐agent systems into their core components. We analyze the architectural principles and key mechanisms that underpin their intelligence, including planning paradigms, memory structures, and reflection‐based self‐improvement. We further investigate the dynamics of multi‐agent systems, exploring coordination strategies, communication protocols, and organizational structures. The paper also covers the crucial aspects of performance evaluation, highlighting influential benchmarks and identifying key challenges. Finally, we synthesize the current landscape to discuss the primary challenges, such as the intrinsic limitations of LLMs and the complexities of ensuring safety and alignment, and chart a course for future research directions, including the drive toward continual learning and enhanced multi‐modal capabilities.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Artificial Intelligence Applications
参考文献 0
引用本文 50
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条