Learning a Language Through Reading: A Meta-analysis of Studies on the Effects of Extensive Reading on Second and Foreign Language Learning
Nina L. Sangers, Lisa van der Sande, Camille Welie, Marjolein Dobber, Roel van Steensel
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Windesheim University of Applied Sciences Erasmus University Rotterdam
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Research on extensive reading (ER) has quite consistently highlighted its impact on second/foreign language learning. However, it remains unclear what the exact components of ER are that make it profitable. In practice, there appears to be variation in the application of key elements of ER, and programs vary in the kinds of additions they make to these elements. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the impact of ER on second/foreign language learning and to examine which key elements and additions to ER contribute to its success. The effects of ER proved to be positive across all included language domains (reading comprehension, vocabulary, decoding/fluency, motivation, writing, oral proficiency, general language proficiency) and target populations, with effect sizes ranging from small to medium. Variability in effect sizes was affected by two intervention characteristics: when learners’ text choice was limited and when some form of accountability was included, effects were larger than when these elements were absent. Additionally, effect sizes were larger when the members of a sample had different first languages. This meta-analysis supports the assumption that encouraging second/foreign language learners to engage in sustained, independent, and self-selected reading promotes a range of second/foreign language skills. Since ER seems to be underutilized as an educational approach in second/foreign language teaching, our outcomes can be taken as a stimulus to promote its use. At the same time, further research is needed, both in the context of second language learning and in younger populations.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Second Language Acquisition and Learning
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Second Language Learning and Teaching
参考文献 77
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 3
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条