Practical challenges in mediation analysis: a guide for applied researchers
Megan S. Schuler, Donna L. Coffman, Elizabeth A. Stuart, Trang Quynh Nguyen, Brian Vegetabile, Daniel F. McCaffrey
RAND Corporation University of South Carolina Johns Hopkins University Princeton University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Mediation analysis is a statistical approach that can provide insights regarding the intermediary processes by which an intervention or exposure affects a given outcome. Mediation analyses rose to prominence, particularly in social science research, with the publication of Baron and Kenny's seminal paper and is now commonly applied in many research disciplines, including health services research. Despite the growth in popularity, applied researchers may still encounter challenges in terms of conducting mediation analyses in practice. In this paper, we provide an overview of conceptual and methodological challenges that researchers face when conducting mediation analyses. Specifically, we discuss the following key challenges: (1) Conceptually differentiating mediators from other "third variables," (2) Extending beyond the single mediator context, (3) Identifying appropriate datasets in which measurement and temporal ordering support the hypothesized mediation model, (4) Selecting mediation effects that reflect the scientific question of interest, (5) Assessing the validity of underlying assumptions of no omitted confounders, (6) Addressing measurement error regarding the mediator, and (7) Clearly reporting results from mediation analyses. We discuss each challenge and highlight ways in which the applied researcher can approach these challenges.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques
Health disparities and outcomes · Health Policy Implementation Science
参考文献 110
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 77
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条