Artificial intelligence-based action recognition and skill assessment in robotic cardiac surgery simulation: a feasibility study
Gennady V. Atroshchenko, Lærke Riis Korup, Nasseh Hashemi, Lasse Riis Østergaard, Martin G. Tolsgaard, Sten Rasmussen
Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg University University of Copenhagen Copenhagen University Hospital
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
To create a deep neural network capable of recognizing basic surgical actions and categorizing surgeons based on their skills using video data only. Nineteen surgeons with varying levels of robotic experience performed three wet lab tasks on a porcine model: robotic-assisted atrial closure, mitral stitches, and dissection of the thoracic artery. We used temporal labeling to mark two surgical actions: suturing and dissection. Each complete recording was annotated as either "novice" or "expert" based on the operator's experience. The network architecture combined a Convolutional Neural Network for extracting spatial features with a Long Short-Term Memory layer to incorporate temporal information. A total of 435 recordings were analyzed. The fivefold cross-validation yielded a mean accuracy of 98% for the action recognition (AR) and 79% for the skill assessment (SA) network. The AR model achieved an accuracy of 93%, with average recall, precision, and F1-score all at 93%. The SA network had an accuracy of 56% and a predictive certainty of 95%. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping revealed that the algorithm focused on the needle, suture, and instrument tips during suturing, and on the tissue during dissection. AR network demonstrated high accuracy and predictive certainty, even with a limited dataset. The SA network requires more data to become a valuable tool for performance evaluation. When combined, these deep learning models can serve as a foundation for AI-based automated post-procedural assessments in robotic cardiac surgery simulation. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05043064).
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Surgical Simulation and Training
Soft Robotics and Applications · Anatomy and Medical Technology
参考文献 46
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 8
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条