How healthcare professionals overcome distance when collaborating with smart robots
Florian Niehaus, Christoph Schank, Francesco Schiavone
University of Vechta Hochschule Düsseldorf University of Applied Sciences Parthenope University of Naples Paris School of Business
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Smart robotic systems continue to make their way from industrial contexts to social applications. That shift necessitates further insights into interactions between human teams/team members and smart robots. These interactions have different patterns than interactions in strictly human teams. This study examines surgical teams and their interactions with the endoscopic surgical system (ESS) ‘da Vinci’ as a concrete implementation case. Its focus is the growing distance between team members upon introduction of the ESS robot. We follow a qualitative approach, based on semi-structured expert interviews with nine physicians of diverse fields of expertise and levels of experience with the ESS robot. Our findings show that surgeries with da Vinci bring about certain improvements as well as obstacles. Those can be grouped into physical, visual and coordinative dimensions. The main obstacles seem to be increased physical and mental distance between the ‘concertmaster role’ (i.e., the surgeon) and ‘ensemble roles’ (i.e., the rest of the surgery team). Surgery teams overcome these by applying visual and informational cues. We strengthen existing literature concerning the established physical distance and add the notion of mental distance in ESS-assisted surgeries. We suggest that surgery teams overcome physical and mental distance through visual and informational cues. Furthermore, we find that certain roles within a team get enriched, trimmed, or redesigned. Developers can utilize our findings to improve ESS robots. Medical and general management staff can use our findings for the improvement of team composition and governance, as well as process optimization and coordination, especially in human-robot teams.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIAI in Service Interactions
Persona Design and Applications · Biomedical and Engineering Education
参考文献 58
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 1
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条