Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: a two-dimensional conceptual framework and meta-review
Maike Schindler, Mustafa Çevikbaş, Achim J. Lilienthal
University of Cologne Vrije Universiteit Brussel Örebro University Technical University of Munich
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming mathematics education just as it is reshaping many other domains of modern life, creating new opportunities that fundamentally change the way students and teachers work. AI has become an increasingly prominent topic in mathematics education, generating a growing body of systematic reviews. However, the review-level literature remains fragmented across different AI paradigms, system types, and methodological approaches. This meta-review synthesizes existing systematic reviews on AI in mathematics education and provides a conceptually oriented interpretation of how AI is shaping mathematics education. We specifically identify and classify the types of AI present in mathematics education as well as the educational functions it fulfills. To organize the synthesis, we propose a conceptual framework that distinguishes between a technological dimension of AI, referring to major AI paradigms and system types, and a functional dimension, referring to the educational roles AI can serve in mathematics education. Following predefined eligibility criteria, 13 systematic review studies were included. The findings show that review-level research on AI in mathematics education is recent and rapidly expanding. Our review maps several AI technologies and systems, including symbolic AI, machine learning, and generative AI. In functional terms, AI was most often conceptualized as adaptive infrastructure, learning partner, teaching tool, and research tool, with a smaller but emerging role of AI as learning content itself. This meta-review provides a structured synthesis of how AI is represented in mathematics education review literature and offers a conceptual basis for future research and responsible AI integration in the field.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIArtificial Intelligence in Education
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
参考文献 55
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 5
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条