Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework
W. Holmes, Kaśka Porayska‐Pomsta, Kenneth Holstein, Emma Sutherland, Toby Tomlinson Baker, Simon Buckingham Shum, Olga C. Santos, Ma. Mercedes T. Rodrigo 等 11 位
University College London Carnegie Mellon University Nesta University of Technology Sydney
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
While Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) research has at its core the desire to support student learning, experience from other AI domains suggest that such ethical intentions are not by themselves sufficient. There is also the need to consider explicitly issues such as fairness, accountability, transparency, bias, autonomy, agency, and inclusion. At a more general level, there is also a need to differentiate between doing ethical things and doing things ethically , to understand and to make pedagogical choices that are ethical, and to account for the ever-present possibility of unintended consequences. However, addressing these and related questions is far from trivial. As a first step towards addressing this critical gap, we invited 60 of the AIED community’s leading researchers to respond to a survey of questions about ethics and the application of AI in educational contexts. In this paper, we first introduce issues around the ethics of AI in education. Next, we summarise the contributions of the 17 respondents, and discuss the complex issues that they raised. Specific outcomes include the recognition that most AIED researchers are not trained to tackle the emerging ethical questions. A well-designed framework for engaging with ethics of AIED that combined a multidisciplinary approach and a set of robust guidelines seems vital in this context.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Artificial Intelligence in Education · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
参考文献 43
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 1,427
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条