LLM-Based Agents for Tool Learning: A Survey
Weikai Xu, Chengrui Huang, Shen Gao, Shuo Shang
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Human beings capable of making and using tools can accomplish tasks far beyond their innate abilities, and this paradigm of integration with tools may not be limited to humans themselves. Recently, the large language model (LLM) has demonstrated immense potential across various fields with its unique planning and reasoning abilities. However, there are still many challenges beyond its capabilities due to deficiencies in its training data and inherent illusions. Thus, integrating LLMs and tools into tool learning agents has become a new emerging research direction. To this end, we present a systematic investigation and comprehensive review of tool-learning agents in this paper. We start by introducing the definition of the tool learning task for Agents and then illustrating the typical architecture of the tool-learning models. Since these tools are all defined by users, LLM does not know what tools there are and what their functions are. Thus, LLMs should first find appropriate tools and split the tool retrieval methods into two categories: training-based and non-training-based. To accurately complete the user task, it is important to decompose the task into several sub-tasks and execute them in the correct order. Following that, we introduce the tool planning methods and organize these works by whether they rely on the model’s inherent reasoning capabilities for planning or utilize external reasoning tools. Due to the rapid development of this field, we also introduce an emerging frontier direction: using multimodal tools for LLM. In addition, we compile current open-source benchmarks and evaluation metrics, focusing on their scale, composition, calculation methods, and assessment dimensions. Next, we introduce several application scenarios for the LLM-based tool learning methods. Finally, we discuss the safety and ethical issues involved in tool learning.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AISemantic Web and Ontologies
Statistical and Computational Modeling · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
参考文献 83
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 44
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条