EBRB–LLM Hybrid Architectures for Trustworthy Agentic AI: Vision, Opportunities, and Challenges
Jun Liu, Chris Nugent, Dehu Yu, Lixian Xu, Muhammad Asim Ali, Xinlei Cao, Long-Hao Yang, Xia Wang
University of Ulster Shandong Jianzhu University Fuzhou University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Agentic AI based on large language models (LLMs) is rapidly evolving from static chatbots to autonomous systems that plan, act, and interact with tools in open-ended environments. However, current LLM agents lack calibrated uncertainty, robust safety mechanisms, and faithful explanations, making them ill-suited for safety-critical settings such as healthcare, finance, cybersecurity, and industrial operations. Extended Belief Rule Bases (EBRB) are representative examples of interpretable, rule-based probabilistic reasoning frameworks with explicit representation of belief and ignorance, and have been successfully applied in complex decision problems without suffering from the rule explosion that affects traditional rule-based approaches. This position paper argues that EBRB could serve as a core safety and reasoning governor within LLM-based agentic pipelines, yielding hybrid systems to better align agentic AI systems with emerging regulatory and ethical requirements for Trustworthy AI (TAI) in high-risk settings. We outline: (i) a conceptual architecture integrating LLMs with EBRB in agentic workflows; (ii) the mapping from this architecture to TAI dimensions including transparency, uncertainty, safety, fairness, and auditability; (iii) concrete opportunities across healthcare, finance, cybersecurity, and industrial safety; and (iv) a research agenda highlighting open challenges in scalable rule induction, co-adaptation between LLMs and EBRB, and evaluation of hybrid agents. Our goal is not to present empirical benchmarks, but to articulate a vision and roadmap for EBRB-enhanced agentic AI that is both powerful and trustworthy.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
参考文献 38
此处列出前 3 条