Assessing creative self-efficacy in the Spanish workplace: Adaptation and validation of two self-report scales
Jorge Cebrián, Julia Sánchez‐García, Pedro J. Ramos‐Villagrasa
Universidad de Zaragoza Escuela Superior de Diseño de Aragón Centro Universitario de la Defensa Zaragoza
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Creativity is a fundamental driver of organizational innovation, and creative self-efficacy (CSE) reflects employees' confidence in their creative potential. Despite the growing interest in measuring CSE in different professional and cultural settings, no evidence-based adaptation of instruments currently exists for Spanish employees. Two widely used measures of CSE were translated and culturally adapted for Spanish workers using a rigorous back-translation process. Data from 405 workers were analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis to examine internal structure. Reliability was estimated with McDonald's ω, and validity evidence was explored through correlations with general self-efficacy, job experience, and personality traits. CFA supported the unidimensional structure of scores from both instruments; fit evidence was satisfactory for incremental indices (CFI and TLI ≥ 0.95), though the RMSEA for the longer scale exceeded conventional cutoffs, reflecting mixed overall fit. Reliability estimates were satisfactory (ω ≥ 0.80 for the short scale; and ω = 0.95 for the longer scale). Convergent validity was supported by strong correlations with general self-efficacy, and additional evidence was obtained through expected associations with job experience and personality traits, particularly openness and extraversion. Findings provide preliminary reliability and validity evidence for CSE scores in Spanish workplace settings. The longer instrument demonstrated superior reliability and is readily available as an open-access resource. It offers a promising option for researchers and practitioners aiming to evaluate creative self-efficacy in Spanish organizational contexts.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Personality Traits and Psychology