Artificial intelligence for eco-design: a systematic review
Maryam Ashkbous, Elham Ghorbani, Samira Keivanpour
Polytechnique Montréal
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Eco-design integrates environmental considerations into product design, recognizing 80% of sustainability impacts determined at the design phase. Artificial intelligence (AI) provides powerful tools for optimizing designs, assessing environmental impacts, and supporting circular economy, making eco-design proactive. Despite AI use in sustainable product development, no review has synthesized these efforts. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review using the PRISMA method, covering 38 studies from 2014 to 2024 applied AI in eco-design. This is the first review to consider all life-cycle stages with eco-design practices, integrating Ellen MacArthur circularity principles, United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs), life cycle assessment (LCA), industrial applications, and AI methods. Our findings reveal: 1- an imbalanced focus across product life-cycle stages, with most studies addressing design and end-of-life, while production, use-life, and distribution remain underexplored. 2- Common eco-design practices include recycling, energy reduction, and disassembly, with less focus on non-hazardous materials, waste minimization, and remanufacturing. 3- While neural networks and hybrid AI methods are commonly applied for material compatibility and emissions prediction, more advanced AI-based approaches such as generative AI and LLMs have yet to be used in design, LCA, and circularity analysis. 4- No study applies all four Ellen MacArthur Technosphere circular economy strategies. 5- Researchers rarely couple LCA with cradle-to-cradle assessments or embed their results in real-time design simulations. 6- Case studies mostly focus on electronics and household appliances, with limited application in automotive, aviation, maritime, and healthcare. 7- SDG consideration mainly centers on SDGs 12 and 13, with more attention needed for other SDGs.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Sustainable Supply Chain Management
BIM and Construction Integration
参考文献 53
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 10
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条