Use of Linguistic Communication Strategies (Hedges and Intensifiers) in Simulated Pharmacy Education Shared Decision-Making
Natalie Cheung, Averil Grieve, Kyle John Wilby, Tim Tran, Angelina Lim
Monash Health Austin Health Monash University Dalhousie University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
OBJECTIVE: Hedges and intensifiers are linguistic strategies that are used to indicate respect for an individual's face needs, particularly their desire to feel autonomous or part of a social group. This study aimed to investigate the use of such linguistic strategies by pharmacy students and their impact on communication grades in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination, focusing on shared decision-making and uptake of pharmacists' recommendations by patients and prescribers. METHODS: An analytical observational retrospective cohort of Objective Structured Clinical Examination videos across poor, average, and good grades was conducted. Underpinned by politeness theory and using summative content analysis and statistical analysis, the use of hedges and intensifiers was identified, mapped, and compared across communication grades. RESULTS: Overall, students used more hedges than intensifiers when interacting with physicians (1253 vs 565) and patients' carers (2026 vs 369). The most common hedges were modal auxiliary verbs (27.5%), whereas the most common intensifiers were high-strength adverbs (47%). Students who were marked as good communicators were seen to use less hedges when speaking with carers than physicians (median 42 vs 29) vs students who were marked with poor communication skills (median 42 vs 38). CONCLUSION: Overall, pharmacy students tend to hedge when making recommendations. Students who were marked highly by examiners showed differences in the number of hedges between the 2 interlocutors, whereas students who were marked as poor communicators used similar language when talking to the patient or the physicians. Study findings provide insight into links between grading and linguistic strategies used and could inform innovative applied linguistic-based communication training programs for students and examiners, which could lead to preparing graduates to utilize linguistic strategies to communicate pharmacist-led recommendations in the workplace.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Communication in Education and Healthcare · Innovations in Medical Education
参考文献 38
此处列出前 3 条