The influence of pulse shape and current direction of TMS on test–retest reliability, and variability of measurement outcomes
Desmond Agboada, Roman Rethwilm, Wolfgang Seiberl, Wolfgang Mack
Universität der Bundeswehr München
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
BACKGROUND: Pulse parameters of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) critically affect the stimulation outcomes. There is, however, a lack of understanding on how these parameters influence test-retest reliability and variability of single-pulse TMS protocols. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the effects of four combinations of pulse shapes and current directions (TMS-waveform conditions) on outcome measurements, test-retest reliability, and variability. METHODS: Using robot-assisted neuronavigation, nineteen participants were stimulated with four TMS-waveform conditions in three repeated sessions within the same day. Sessions 1 and 2, and Sessions 1 and 3 were separated by 30 min, and approximately 7 h, respectively. The four TMS-waveform conditions were: biphasic and monophasic pulses delivered in either posterior-anterior (PA) or anterior-posterior (AP) current directions. TMS protocols investigated were resting/active motor thresholds, stimulus intensity for inducing 1 mV peak-to-peak motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, corticospinal excitability measurements (MEP amplitudes and latencies) with three inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) of 5, 10, and 15 s; input-output (I/O) curve, and cortical silent period. RESULTS: TMS-waveform influenced all spTMS protocol outcome measures except for the I/O. TMS pulses in the PA current direction generally induced less variable MEP amplitudes and latencies. Moderate to excellent test-retest reliability was also found for all protocols except the I/O, however TMS-waveform only influenced the reliability of the AMT and MEP latency protocols. Monophasic pulses in the PA direction were more reliable compared to pulses in AP for MEP latency, while biphasic pulses in the AP direction showed significantly lower reliability compared to other TMS-waveform conditions for the AMT. CONCLUSION: This systematic evaluation does shed more light on protocols and TMS pulse parameters that induce reliable and less variable measurements.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Neurological disorders and treatments · Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
参考文献 63
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 3
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条