A systematic review of the effect of pulse parameters of next-generation TMS devices on corticospinal excitability and neuroplasticity
Desmond Agboada, Roman Rethwilm, Manuel Kuder, Wolfgang Mack, Wolfgang Seiberl
Universität der Bundeswehr München
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
BACKGROUND: Conventional TMS devices are limited in the number of variations of pulse parameters they produce, which limits the extension of TMS application. Recently, however, successful attempts have been made to introduce next-generation (next-gen) TMS devices with adjustable pulse parameters. Although research using these devices is still in its infancy, a systematic synthesis of the direction of results is valuable to identify the current progress and some limitations of these technologies which can guide further studies in the field. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to investigate the influence of pulse parameters (width, shape, and current direction) of next-gen TMS devices on corticospinal excitability and the induction of neuroplasticity. METHODS: Using the PRISMA method of reporting systematic reviews, we searched major biomedical databases - PubMed (n = 84), Web of Science (n = 141), Scopus (n = 111) and APA PsychInfo (n = 27) for literature, with 21 studies included in this review. RESULTS: Compared to conventional TMS devices, next-generation TMS devices were more efficient in many neurophysiological measurements. For plasticity inducing protocols, both inhibitory and facilitatory protocols showed enhanced respective inhibitory and excitatory after-effects with increasing pulse width. The new near-rectangular pulse shape moreover induced stronger inhibitory after-effects compared to conventional pulses. CONCLUSIONS: Next-generation devices expand the parameter space of TMS. Further studies are however needed to explore the full potential of these next-gen devices, especially in non-motor brain regions. SIGNIFICANCE: Next-gen TMS devices do hold a promise in the optimization of the neuromodulatory effects of TMS.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research · Traumatic Brain Injury Research
参考文献 78
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 1
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条