Ranking pre-trained speech embeddings in Parkinson's disease detection: Does Wav2Vec 2.0 outperform its 1.0 version across speech modes and languages?
Ondřej Klempíř, Adela Skryjova, Aleš Tichopád, Radim Krupička
Czech Technical University in Prague
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Speech and language technologies are effective tools for identifying the distinct speech changes associated with Parkinson's disease (PD), enabling earlier and more accurate diagnosis. Models leveraging recent advancements in self-supervised speech pretraining, such as Wav2Vec, have demonstrated superior performance over traditional feature extraction methods. While Wav2Vec 2.0 has been successfully utilized for PD detection, a rigorous quantitative comparison with Wav2Vec 1.0 is needed to comprehensively evaluate its advantages, limitations, and applicability across different speech modes in PD. This study presents a systematic comparison of Wav2Vec 1.0 and Wav2Vec 2.0 embeddings across three multilingual datasets using various classification approaches to classify normal (healthy controls; HC) and PD-affected speech. Additionally, both Wav2Vec 1.0 and 2.0 were benchmarked against traditional baseline features across diverse linguistic contexts, including spontaneous speech, non-spontaneous speech, and isolated vowels. A multicriteria TOPSIS approach was employed to rank feature extraction methods, revealing that Wav2Vec 2.0 excelled across speech modes, with its first transformer layer demonstrating the best performance for classifying read text and monologue, and its feature extractor performing best in vowel-based classification. In contrast, Wav2Vec 1.0, while generally outperformed by Wav2Vec 2.0, still provided a more efficient alternative with competitive performance. Finally, we combined selected layers from both architectures and have demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy in vowel-based classification. This comparative analysis underscores the strengths of both Wav2Vec architectures and informs their optimal use in PD detection.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Voice and Speech Disorders
Natural Language Processing Techniques · Speech Recognition and Synthesis
参考文献 33
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 9
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条