A prospective audit of TikTok’s response to UK drug-selling accounts
Ashly Fuller, Stephen M. Husbands, Shane D. Johnson, Judith A. Aldridge, Christopher R. Pudney
University College London University of Bath
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
BACKGROUND: Mainstream social media platforms host public advertisements that connect drug sellers with potential buyers, but we are not aware of independent evidence on the performance of user-reporting systems relating to drug-selling content. We audited TikTok's response to reports of UK-facing drug-selling accounts. METHODS: We purposively identified 455 public accounts advertising cocaine, synthetic-cannabinoid e-cigarette liquids or controlled medicines to UK users. Eligible accounts displayed an offer or route to supply. Accounts were reported through TikTok's regulated-goods pathway and revisited after 2, 7 and 14 days. RESULTS: TikTok returned an explicit "no violation" decision for 95.2% of reports. After 14 days, 83.5% of accounts remained publicly accessible, with persistence across all three market categories. CONCLUSIONS: TikTok's ordinary account-reporting pathway produced ineffective removal of the overt UK-facing drug-selling accounts examined in this audit. Most were classified as non-violating and remained publicly accessible two weeks after reporting. The consistency of this outcome across distinct drug markets indicates a cross-cutting weakness in the tested reactive moderation pathway and warrants examination of how reports are classified, escalated and acted upon.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AICybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Misinformation and Its Impacts
参考文献 10
此处列出前 3 条