Advanced Humidified Gas Turbine Cycle Concepts Applied to Micro Gas Turbine Applications for Optimal Waste Heat Recovery
Ward De Paepe, Marina Montero Carrerro, Svend Bram, Alessandro Parente, Francesco Contino
Université Libre de Bruxelles Vrije Universiteit Brussel
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Introduction of water in a micro Gas Turbine (mGT) has proven to be a very efficient way to introduce waste heat in the cycle. The injection of preheated water/steam in the mGT cycle will increase the efficiency of the cycle significantly. Different routes exist for water injection in an mGT cycle. Classical routes, like injection of steam/preheated water or the micro Humid Air Turbine (mHAT) cycle, where water is introduced in the cycle by means of a saturation tower, have shown to have high potential, however do not fully exploit the maximal potential for waste heat recovery. More advanced humidified gas turbine cycles exist on large scale, but these concepts have not yet been applied on mGT scale. In this paper, we study the impact of these different, more advanced, humidified gas turbine cycle concepts on the mGT performance. The different selected cycles – next to the classical Steam Injected Gas Turbine (STIG), injection of (preheated) water and the mHAT – were: mHAT-plus, Advanced Humid Air Turbine (AHAT) and the Regeneration EVAPoration cycle (REVAP®). Simulations indicated that humidifying the air of the mGT has a significant beneficial effect on the cycle performance, resulting in increased electrical power output and efficiency. Depending on the different used cycle layout, more waste heat could be recovered from the exhaust gas. The REVAP® cycle with feedwater preheat was identified as the optimal cycle layout within the selected cycles. Using this concept, the stack temperature could be lowered to 53 °C, corresponding to an increase in electrical power output of 128.7 kWe with a maximal absolute efficiency increase of 6.9% compared to the dry cycle layout (100.1 kWe electrical power output and 35.1% efficiency).
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
参考文献 21
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 17
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条