Deep-learning architecture for PM2.5 concentration prediction: A review
Shiyun Zhou, Wei Wang, Long Zhu, Qi Qiao, Yulin Kang
Beijing Institute of Technology Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences Beijing Normal University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Accurately predicting the concentration of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) is crucial for evaluating air pollution levels and public exposure. Recent advancements have seen a significant rise in using deep learning (DL) models for forecasting PM 2.5 concentrations. Nonetheless, there is a lack of unified and standardized frameworks for assessing the performance of DL-based PM 2.5 prediction models. Here we extensively reviewed those DL-based hybrid models for forecasting PM 2.5 levels according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We examined the similarities and differences among various DL models in predicting PM 2.5 by comparing their complexity and effectiveness. We categorized PM 2.5 DL methodologies into seven types based on performance and application conditions, including four types of DL-based models and three types of hybrid learning models. Our research indicates that established deep learning architectures are commonly used and respected for their efficiency. However, many of these models often fall short in terms of innovation and interpretability. Conversely, models hybrid with traditional approaches, like deterministic and statistical models, exhibit high interpretability but compromise on accuracy and speed. Besides, hybrid DL models, representing the pinnacle of innovation among the studied models, encounter issues with interpretability. We introduce a novel three-dimensional evaluation framework, i.e., Dataset-Method-Experiment Standard (DMES) to unify and standardize the evaluation for PM 2.5 predictions using DL models. This review provides a framework for future evaluations of DL-based models, which could inspire researchers to standardize DL model usage in PM 2.5 prediction and improve the quality of related studies. • We reviewed 118 papers on deep-learning methods for PM 2.5 prediction. • We provided an in-depth analysis of their respective strengths and weaknesses. • We proposed DMES framework to help researchers enhance model quality and generalization.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Air Quality and Health Impacts · Hydrological Forecasting Using AI