Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the Eight-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD-8): Specific cultural considerations for the assessment of depression
Amira Mohammed Ali, Saeed Abdullah AL-Dossary, Feten Fekih‐Romdhane, Rana Ali Alameri, Carlos Laranjeira, Haitham Khatatbeh, Mohamed Ali Zoromba, Abdulmajeed A. Alkhamees 等 11 位
Alexandria University University of Ha'il Hôpital Razi de La Manouba Faculté de médecine de Tunis
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Background: Despite extensive evaluations of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), its shortest version, the Eight-Item version (CESD-8), is less investigated, with absolute lack of information on its psychometric properties in the Arab world. Methods: 314), were analyzed through exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and multigroup analysis to examine the structure and measurement invariance of the CESD-8. Convergent validity and internal consistency tests involved correlating the CESD-8 with its subscales, item analysis measures, and intra class correlations. Criterion validity tests involved correlating the CESD-8 and its subscales with a single-item measure of happiness. Results: Exploratory factor analysis produced two factors (negative affect and positive affect) with eigen values >1, which explained 86.4 % of the variance. In confirmatory factor analysis, the crude exploratory factor analysis model had good fit while the fit of the unidimensional CESD-8 and another two-factor structure (depressed affect and somatic complaints) was improved by correlating the residuals of the items of positive affect (CESD4 and CESD6). A three-factor model (depressed affect, somatic complaints, and positive affect) expressed the best fit in the absence of error correlations. This model was invariant across groups of students and employees, gender, and age. The scale and its three dimensions demonstrated adequate internal consistency (alpha coefficient range = 0.65-0.89), convergent validity (item total correlation range = 0.43-0.80 and range of correlations with the CESD-8 = -0.68-0.92), and criterion validity (range of correlations with happiness scores = -0.40-0.60). Conclusions: The CESD-8 is a valid short scale for quick identification of people with depressive psychopathologies. Using the CESD-8 to detect heterogenous depressive symptoms, rather than assessing depression as a whole condition, may influence our understanding of the dynamics and treatments of depression in specific groups/cultures, with emphasis on absence of positive affect in the definition of depression among Arabs. Replications of the three-factor structure in different cultures are needed.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIPsychometric Methodologies and Testing
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Health Education and Validation
参考文献 78
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 16
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条