Self-piercing riveting process: Prediction of joint characteristics through finite element and neural network modeling
Nikolaos Karathanasopoulos, Kedar S. Pandya, Dirk Mohr
ETH Zurich
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Developing robust numerical simulation tools to investigate the self-piercing riveting process is critical, since the feasibility, quality and strength of riveted connections relies on the successful formation of mechanical interlocks between the rivet and sheet materials. In the present study, we investigate the riveting of aluminum alloy and dual-phase steel sheets (AA7075-F/DP600 and AA6016-T4/DP600) over a wide range of sheet thicknesses, as a function of the rivet and die geometries employed. More specifically, we study the dependence of the probability of successful joint formation, defined as the ratio of the number of acceptable riveted connections to the total number of test cases, on the rivet leg inner radius and die central tip depth. Towards this, we use experimentally calibrated Hosford-Coulomb fracture surfaces for each deformable part, incorporated in dedicated axisymmetric 2D finite element (FE) process models. The FE predictions are validated through comparisons with experimentally obtained riveted joints. Moreover, we analyze the relation between the mechanical interlocks achieved and the rivet and die geometries employed, deriving practice-relevant conclusions with respect to the most favorable design parameters. In particular, we show that while the probability of successful joint formation decreases upon increasing rivet leg inner radius, the joint quality, in terms of effectuated interlock distance per rivet mean residual equivalent plastic strain, increases. Furthermore, we show that machine-learning techniques can be employed to classify with remarkable accuracy the successful joint formation for a wide range of possible self-piercing riveting scenarios, accounting for both rivet and die-related geometrical attributes, as well as for the thickness of the metal sheets.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and mechanical properties
参考文献 45
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 52
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条