The clinical utility and reliability of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: A systematic review
Timothy Lathlean, Akhilesh Kumar Ramachandran, Stephanie Sim, Ian R. Whittle
The University of Adelaide Cardiff Metropolitan University Monash University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common disorder worldwide, affecting young and old adults alike. Kinematic studies of lumbar-pelvic mobility allied with surface electromyogram (sEMG) can assist in the assessment and management of CLBP. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the evidence relating to the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the surface electromyogram in chronic low back pain patients during flexion-extension-relaxation tasks. Five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and CINAHL) were searched for eligible studies from inception to March 2024. The risk of bias assessment for the included studies was conducted using the QUADAS-2 tool. Studies included adults (≥18 years) with CLBP > 3 months, reported diagnostic accuracy or reliability measures for sEMG during flexion-extension-relaxation tasks. Eleven studies were included in our systematic review. The risk of bias was found to be high for patient selection, reference standard and flow and timing domains with low risk of bias for the index test domain in most of the included studies. For diagnostic accuracy, six studies reported values ranging between 56-99 % indicating poor to excellent accuracy levels. Four studies reported values between 76-100 % for sensitivity and 65-100 % for specificity indicating sufficient to excellent accuracy levels. Seven studies reported moderate to excellent reliability levels, ranging between 0.66-0.99. This systematic review found the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of sEMG in CLBP patients to range from poor to excellent levels. This systematic review adds knowledge for practitioners and clinicians regarding the use of sEMG during forward, flexion and relaxation tasks/movements.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
参考文献 84
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 5
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条