Assessing feature extraction, selection, and classification combinations for crop mapping using Sentinel-2 time series: A case study in northern Italy
Rahat Tufail, Patrizia Tassinari, Daniele Torreggiani
University of Bologna
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Rural areas need constant monitoring to ensure sustainable farming and respond to environmental and climatic impacts. Over the last few decades, remote sensing data have been extensively used in agricultural monitoring, allowing cost-effective and efficient crop management. Selecting the suitable data combinations for crop mapping while reducing dimensionality and redundancy to speed up processing remains a challenge. This study address the challenges by testing and assessing the efficiency of various combinations of feature extraction, feature selection, and feature classification methods. We used Sentinel-2 time series data, which focused on spectral features and derived vegetation indices. Particularly, the red-edge indices which are critical for crop discrimination. To select the optimal data for classifiers, we have tested two feature selection techniques: Random Forest and Principal Component Analysis, for both spectral bands and vegetational indices. Then, we have employed three machine learning algorithms: Extreme Gradient Boost (XGB), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) along with one deep learning approach, Pixel-Set Encoders and Temporal Self-Attention (PSETAE), to evaluate the datasets. The results suggest that the most effective feature set is the Sentinel-2 spectral bands selected by the Random Forest feature selection method. The results obtained from the previous step achieve the highest overall accuracy with the XGB classifier and outperform the RF, SVM, and PSETAE classifiers. Further, quantitative analysis of overall classification accuracies showed that Random Forest is the second-best performing classifier, and PSETAE classifier produced the lowest results for all data models.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Smart Agriculture and AI
参考文献 81
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 10
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条