Effectiveness of CFG pile-slab structure on soft soil for supporting high-speed railway embankment
Dingbang Zhang, Yi Zhang, Chul Woo Kim, Yuan Meng, Akhil Garg, Ankit Garg, Kun Fang
Kyoto University Hubei Polytechnic University Tsinghua University Shantou University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The use of cement-fly ash-gravel (CFG) pile-slab structures is a new effective technique for reducing the settlements of soft foundations in China. A comprehensive research was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a CFG pile-slab structure-supported embankment of the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway in China. Firstly, an analytical method was formulated to calculate the settlements of the CFG pile-slab structure-supported embankment. Secondly, mechanical scaling laws were derived for the proposed testing plan at model scale. Model tests were conducted to quantify and to interpret the settlement distributions. Thirdly, the influence of three key factors (pile length, pile diameter, and slab thickness) for the structural form of the CFG pile-slab structure-supported embankment on the settlement distribution were studied using numerical simulations. The maximum settlements of the CFG pile-slab structure-supported embankment in optimizing the structural form were obtained using the above three research methods and then they were compared with each other. The results show that (1) the settlements obtained by the analytical method, the physical model tests, and the numerical simulations showed good concordance with each other; (2) the settlement-controlling effect of the CFG pile-slab structure was able to meet the requirements of high-speed railway construction; (3) the piles and the soil-bearing capacities of the CFG pile-slab structure-supporting embankment could be fully mobilized because of the “load re-distribution” function of the slab; and (4) the affected area of the engineering load had a depth of more than 18.75 m and a horizontal length of 7.5 m near the toe of the embankment slope.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
参考文献 36
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 33
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条