From alarm to action: a systematic review of pre-evacuation time influences in fire emergencies within the built environment
Hongwei Liu, Zimo Liu, Mei Ye Kho, Farid Wajdi Akashah
University of Malaya
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Pre-evacuation constitutes a critical phase influencing the success of fire evacuations. Despite its importance as a key parameter in evacuation modelling and building safety assessments, pre-evacuation time is inconsistently defined and remains insufficiently explored. This study systematically reviews and synthesises evidence from 78 peer-reviewed studies to examine the factors influencing pre-evacuation time during fire emergencies in the built environment. The evidence synthesised indicates that voice-based alarm signals, prior evacuation experience, and the presence of authority figures are associated with shorter pre-evacuation delays. In contrast, unexpected evacuation contexts, physical or cognitive impairments, engagement in high-attention tasks, and item retrieval activities are consistently linked to prolonged response times. The review also identifies several research gaps, including pronounced regional disparities in study distribution, persistent inconsistent definitions of pre-evacuation time, and limited attention to vulnerable populations. In response to these limitations, this review clarifies the SFPE-based definition of pre-evacuation time and provides a more refined and operational framework to support consistent application and comparison across studies. The findings further highlight practical implications, including the need to strengthen information delivery mechanisms, provide adequate support for occupants with reduced abilities, enhance evacuation training, and mitigate delays arising from pre-evacuation activities. Overall, this study advances understanding of pre-evacuation dynamics, provides an evidence-based foundation for policy formulation and evacuation model development, and contributes to improving fire safety management and reducing fire-related casualties.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Fire dynamics and safety research · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
参考文献 62
此处列出前 3 条