Performance metrics for the objective assessment of capacitive deionization systems
Steven A. Hawks, Ashwin Ramachandran, S. Porada, Patrick G. Campbell, Matthew E. Suss, Pieter Maarten Biesheuvel, Juan Gabriel Santiago, Michael Stadermann
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Stanford University Wetsus, European Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Water Technology University of Twente
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
In the growing field of capacitive deionization (CDI), a number of performance metrics have emerged to describe the desalination process. Unfortunately, the separation conditions under which these metrics are measured are often not specified, resulting in optimal performance at minimal removal. Here we outline a system of performance metrics and reporting conditions that resolves this issue. Our proposed system is based on volumetric energy consumption (Wh/m3) and throughput productivity (L/h/m2) reported for a specific average concentration reduction, water recovery, and feed salinity. To facilitate and rationalize comparisons between devices, materials, and operation modes, we propose a nominal standard separation of removing 5 mM from a 20 mM NaCl feed solution at 50% water recovery. We propose this particular separation as a standard, but emphasize that the rationale presented here applies irrespective of separation details. Using our proposed separation, we compare the desalination performance of a flow-through electrode (fte-CDI) cell and a flow between membrane (fb-MCDI) device, showing how significantly different systems can be compared in terms of generally desirable desalination characteristics. In general, we find that performance analysis must be considered carefully so to not allow for ambiguous separation conditions or the maximization of one metric at the expense of another. Additionally, for context and clarity, we discuss a number of important underlying performance indicators and cell characteristics that are not performance measures in and of themselves but can be examined to better understand differences in performance.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
Membrane Separation Technologies · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
参考文献 79
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 279
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条