AI-Based In-House Medical Devices at a Regulatory Crossroads: Beneficial Regime or Legal Loophole?
Eylem Karakaya, Sofia Palmieri, Elisabetta Biasin
KU Leuven Harvard University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The Medical Device Regulation (MDR) establishes an in-house exemption regime that allows medical devices, manufactured and used exclusively within health institutions in the European Union (EU), to be put into service with reduced regulatory requirements. This exemption excludes the need for a conformity assessment by a notified body, provided that the general safety and performance requirements are met. As a result, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based in-house medical devices, despite their potential risk classification, do not fulfil the cumulative conditions outlined in Article 6 of the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) necessary for categorisation as high-risk AI systems. This regulatory disconnect reveals a significant gap in the alignment between the MDR and the AI Act, raising concerns about regulatory oversight for AI-based in-house medical devices. Academia has already explored the application of the AI Act on medical devices and the interplay between the MDR and the AI Act. What remains insufficiently examined, however, is the classification under the AI Act of AI-based in-house medical devices. This paper examines this issue and analyses whether the low-risk classification may amount to a legal loophole. Ultimately, it also offers recommendations on how to safeguard innovation while simultaneously reinforcing safety.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Healthcare Regulation · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education