Model predictive control of fluid–structure interaction via Koopman-based reduced-order model
Haokui Jiang, Shunxiang Cao
Tsinghua University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This study presents an active flow control framework for fluid–structure interaction (FSI) systems involving a flexible plate in the wake of a cylinder, by integrating Koopman-based reduced-order models (ROMs) with model predictive control (MPC). Specifically, a novel switched-system control strategy is developed, wherein kernel dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) and residual DMD are jointly employed to construct accurate ROMs capable of capturing strongly nonlinear FSI dynamics. This approach ensures accurate low-order representations across multiple control inputs, while suppressing spurious modes. The resulting Koopman ROMs provide fast state predictions over a receding horizon, enabling an MPC optimiser to determine real-time actuation. To improve control performance, resolvent analysis is utilised to optimise the actuator–probe placement. Remarkably, only three strategically placed structural probes are sufficient to capture dominant Koopman modes and enable effective closed-loop control. The proposed framework is then applied to regulate synthetic jets on the cylinder to suppress the plate’s flapping. It successfully stabilises large-amplitude (LAF), small-deflection (SDF) and small-amplitude (SAF) flapping regimes within a unified control strategy. By combining Koopman modal decomposition with an analysis of system energy evolution, we elucidate distinct control mechanisms across these regimes. For LAF and SAF cases, control is achieved primarily through local modulation of existing saturated modes, which requires relatively low actuation energy. In contrast, stabilisation of the SDF case involves the emergence of entirely new Koopman modes that disrupt the original symmetry-breaking dynamics, resulting in increased control input. The framework matches the control performance of reinforcement learning while markedly reducing computational cost.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
参考文献 73
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 6
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条