A Review of Research on the Quality and Use of Chemistry Textbooks
Bailey A. Thompson, Zoie L. Bunch, Maia Popova
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The number of studies analyzing chemistry textbooks has steadily increased over the years and has notably surged in the past decade. In this literature review, we examine the research literature on chemistry textbooks. The review spans 40 years of research (from 1981 to 2021) and includes 79 studies published in over 20 different journals, analyzing secondary and postsecondary chemistry textbooks used in more than 17 countries. We synthesize the samples and methods used as well as the findings of the studies around chemistry textbooks. Based on this synthesis, we provide multiple concrete implications to improve the rigor of future studies of chemistry textbooks because most of the articles in our review lack a discussion of the limitations of their studies, half do not use any theoretical or analytical framework(s) to guide the design of their studies and the interpretation of findings, and a quarter do not specify the country of use for the textbooks in their samples. Additionally, we provide concrete recommendations for textbook developers to improve the quality of chemistry textbooks. Importantly, textbook developers need to ensure that their products are grounded in research and theory about student learning.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Chemistry Education and Research
Science Education and Pedagogy · Various Chemistry Research Topics
参考文献 94
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 24
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条