Vertical structure of bottom Ekman tidal flows: Observations, theory, and modeling from the northern Adriatic
J. W. Book, Paul J. Martin, Ivica Janeković, Milivoj Kuzmić, Mark Wimbush
Ruđer Bošković Institute University of Rhode Island
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
From September 2002 to May 2003, fifteen bottom‐mounted, acoustic Doppler current profilers measured currents of the northern Adriatic basin. Tidal fluctuations at all seven of the major Adriatic frequencies were synthesized from a response tidal analysis of these measurements. Most observed tidal current ellipses were nearly reversing, but near the bottom, tidal current ellipses all shortened and broadened, semidiurnal currents led upper water column currents, and diurnal tidal current ellipse orientations rotated counterclockwise toward the bottom. Theoretical solutions for a tidally forced, bottom Ekman layer with vertical eddy viscosity of the form Az = βz + k were least squares fit to the observations. Average values were β = 3 · 10−4 m/s and k = 5 · 10−4 m2/s. The value of k was important in matching tidal orientation and phase changes, and a nonzero β was important in matching tidal amplitude changes. The Navy Coastal Ocean Model (NCOM) and the Quoddy model were also compared to the observations. The average RMS errors for the bottom Ekman layer were 0.22 cm/s for the best fit theory, 0.35 cm/s for NCOM, and 0.36 cm/s for Quoddy. Az structures from NCOM and Quoddy show that time variation in Az is relatively unimportant for Adriatic tides. The bottom shear stresses from theory were larger in magnitude than those from the bottom drag formulations in NCOM and Quoddy.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Aquatic and Environmental Studies · Coastal and Marine Dynamics
参考文献 45
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 32
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条