Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity.
Paul Joseph Silvia, Roger E. Beaty, Emily C. Nusbaum, Kari Merrill Eddington, Holly Frances Levin-Aspenson, Thomas Richard Kwapil
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Richards proposed that everyday creativity—creative actions that are common among ordinary people in daily life, such as drawing, making recipes, writing, and any activity done with the purpose of being creative—both fosters and reflects psychological health. To explore when people are more likely to do something creative during the day, and to see who tends to act more creatively, we conducted a week-long experience-sampling study with a sample of young adults. Throughout the day, people’s actions and feelings were randomly sampled, with an emphasis on whether people were doing something creative. Consistent with the notion of everyday creativity as a psychological strength, within-person models showed that people who reported feeling happy and active were more likely to be doing something creative at the time. Between-person models found that openness to experience and conscientiousness had large effects on whether people spent their time on creative pursuits. Neither negative states (e.g., momentary feelings of anger, stress, and self-consciousness) nor traits (e.g., neuroticism) significantly predicted creative activity. The findings support Richards’s theorizing about everyday creative behavior as a cause and effect of positive psychological processes, and they illustrate the value of experience sampling for uncovering what creativity looks like in people’s idiosyncratic environments.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Personality Traits and Psychology
参考文献 42
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 215
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条