Using Psychological Science To Understand And Fight Health Misinformation: An APA Consensus Statement
Sander van der Linden, Dolores Albarracín, Lisa K. Fazio, Deen Freelon, Jon Roozenbeek, Briony Swire‐Thompson, Jay Joseph Van Bavel
Northeastern University Vanderbilt University University of Cambridge New York University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
There is widespread concern that misinformation poses dangerous risks to health, well-being, and civic life.Despite a growing body of research on the topic, significant questions remain about (a) psychological factors that render people susceptible to misinformation, (b) the extent to which it affects real-world behavior, (c) how it spreads online and offline, and (d) intervention strategies that counter and correct it effectively.This report reviews the best available psychological science research to reach consensus on each of these crucial questions, particularly as they pertain to health-related misinformation.In addition, the report offers eight specific recommendations for scientists, policymakers, and health professionals who seek to recognize and respond to misinformation in health care and beyond.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Misinformation and Its Impacts
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Academic Publishing and Open Access
参考文献 325
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 28
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条