The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies
Scott J. Kirklin, James E. Saal, Bryce Meredig, Alexander E. Thompson, Jeff W. Doak, Muratahan Aykol, Stephan Rühl, Chris M. Wolverton
Northwestern University FIZ Karlsruhe – Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD) is a high-throughput database currently consisting of nearly 300,000 density functional theory (DFT) total energy calculations of compounds from the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) and decorations of commonly occurring crystal structures. To maximise the impact of these data, the entire database is being made available, without restrictions, at www.oqmd.org/download . In this paper, we outline the structure and contents of the database, and then use it to evaluate the accuracy of the calculations therein by comparing DFT predictions with experimental measurements for the stability of all elemental ground-state structures and 1,670 experimental formation energies of compounds. This represents the largest comparison between DFT and experimental formation energies to date. The apparent mean absolute error between experimental measurements and our calculations is 0.096 eV/atom. In order to estimate how much error to attribute to the DFT calculations, we also examine deviation between different experimental measurements themselves where multiple sources are available, and find a surprisingly large mean absolute error of 0.082 eV/atom. Hence, we suggest that a significant fraction of the error between DFT and experimental formation energies may be attributed to experimental uncertainties. Finally, we evaluate the stability of compounds in the OQMD (including compounds obtained from the ICSD as well as hypothetical structures), which allows us to predict the existence of ~3,200 new compounds that have not been experimentally characterised and uncover trends in material discovery, based on historical data available within the ICSD.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
材料 / 化学Machine Learning in Materials Science
X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
参考文献 76
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 2,461
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条