Free-roaming dogs limit habitat use of giant pandas in nature reserves
Ramana Callan, Jacob Robert Owens, Wenlei Bi, Benjamin Kilham, Xia Yan, Dunwu Qi, Rong Hou, James Robert Spotila 等 9 位
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding Drexel University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) were historically hunted using dogs and are currently threatened by free-roaming dogs and their associated diseases. To better understand the spatial magnitude of this threat, we used a GIS approach to investigate edge effects of dogs on giant panda habitat. We first examined two nature reserves with contrasting free-roaming dog populations: Liziping, with many dogs (~0.44/km2), and Daxiangling, with few dogs (~0.14/km2). Spatial analysis indicated that giant pandas at Liziping (but not Daxiangling) showed a shift in habitat use away from populated areas consistent with a risk response to the foray distance of free-roaming dogs (10.9 km path-distance). Most giant panda locations (86%) from the 2014 census in Liziping were clustered around remote “dog-free zones.” Expanding this analysis across the entire giant panda range revealed that 40% of panda habitat is within the foray distance of dogs. Our assessment will inform dog control programs including monitoring, education, veterinary care, and other measures. We recommend that reserves designated for the release of translocated pandas receive priority consideration for dog control efforts. Only by understanding and managing complex interactions between humans, domestic animals, and wild animals can we sustain natural systems in a world increasingly dominated by humans.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation · Rangeland and Wildlife Management
参考文献 54
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 11
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条