A comparative analysis of option pricing models: Black–Scholes, Bachelier, and artificial neural networks
Eric M. Gross, Ryan G. Kruger, Francois Toerien
University of the Witwatersrand University of Cape Town
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Practitioners and academics alike have applied the Black–Scholes model when pricing options practically since its introduction in 1973. The COVID-19 pandemic and the oil futures price crash of April 2020 caused major markets to briefly switch to the less widely known Bachelier model to price derivatives, as the model allows for negative strikes on the underlying. This study evaluates the predictive ability and accuracy of the Bachelier model and the Black–Scholes model when pricing European call options on the Standard & Poor’s 500 index using five volatility estimation methods. Moreover, it compares the forecasts of the two parameterized models to a deep feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) which is also used to price such options. Overall, the ANN is statistically superior in its predictive ability relative to both parameterized models, and there is no statistical difference in predictive ability between the Black–Scholes and Bachelier models. These results are of relevance to both academics and participants in the options markets.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Market Dynamics and Volatility
Energy Load and Power Forecasting · Stochastic processes and financial applications
参考文献 27
此处列出前 3 条