Sparse autoencoders uncover biologically interpretable features in protein language model representations
Onkar Singh Gujral, Mihir Bafna, Eric J. Alm, Bonnie Berger
Toronto Metropolitan University Massachusetts Institute of Technology
内容与影响
Foundation models in biology-particularly protein language models (PLMs)-have enabled ground-breaking predictions in protein structure, function, and beyond. However, the "black-box" nature of these representations limits transparency and explainability, posing challenges for human-AI collaboration and leaving open questions about their human-interpretable features. Here, we leverage sparse autoencoders (SAEs) and a variant, transcoders, from natural language processing to extract, in a completely unsupervised fashion, interpretable sparse features present in both protein-level and amino acid (AA)-level representations from ESM2, a popular PLM. Unlike other approaches such as training probes for features, the extraction of features by the SAE is performed without any supervision. We find that many sparse features extracted from SAEs trained on protein-level representations are tightly associated with Gene Ontology (GO) terms across all levels of the GO hierarchy. We also use Anthropic's Claude to automate the interpretation of sparse features for both protein-level and AA-level representations and find that many of these features correspond to specific protein families and functions such as the NAD Kinase, IUNH, and the PTH family, as well as proteins involved in methyltransferase activity and in olfactory and gustatory sensory perception. We show that sparse features are more interpretable than ESM2 neurons across all our trained SAEs and transcoders. These findings demonstrate that SAEs offer a promising unsupervised approach for disentangling biologically relevant information present in PLM representations, thus aiding interpretability. This work opens the door to safety, trust, and explainability of PLMs and their applications, and paves the way to extracting meaningful biological insights across increasingly powerful models in the life sciences.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
回答优先基于摘要、文献信息与可获取全文;依据不足时会明确说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms · Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
参考文献 24
此处列出前 3 条
施引文献 26
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条