Moral injury in teaching: the systemic roots of ethical conflict and emotional burnout in education
Glenys Oberg
The University of Queensland
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Moral injury, a concept derived from military psychology, has gained increasing relevance in understanding the ethical and emotional challenges faced by teachers in educational settings. This article investigates moral injury in the teaching profession, focusing on its systemic roots, manifestations, and implications. Using qualitative data from 57 Australian educators, this study explores how teachers experience and navigate moral injury in their professional roles. The study identifies betrayal, ethical conflict, and systemic pressures as central constructs of moral injury. Teachers report feeling unsupported by leadership, constrained by conflicting institutional demands, and disempowered by resource shortages and inequitable policies. These challenges are compounded by intersecting constructs such as compassion fatigue and secondary traumatic stress, further undermining professional efficacy and well-being. Using Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory, the study examines moral injury across micro-, meso-, exo-, macro-, and chronosystem levels, revealing how interactions within and across these systems exacerbate ethical and emotional burdens on teachers. The findings underscore the systemic nature of moral injury, emphasising its roots in institutional frameworks, societal attitudes, and chronic resource inequities. To mitigate moral injury, the study advocates for systemic reforms, including trauma-informed practices, equitable resource distribution, and growth-based assessment models. Professional development programmes focusing on ethical decision-making and resilience-building are also recommended to equip teachers to navigate these challenges. By reframing moral injury as a systemic rather than an individual issue, this research highlights the collective responsibility of educational stakeholders in fostering supportive environments that sustain teacher well-being and enhance educational outcomes.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Counseling Practices and Supervision
Resilience and Mental Health · Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
参考文献 25
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 21
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条