Legibility difference between e-books and paper books by using an eye tracker
Jung-Yong Kim, Seung Nam Min, Murali Subramaniyam, Young-Jin Cho
Hanyang University Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science
内容与影响
The aim of the study was to evaluate the difference in legibility between e-books and paper books by using an eye tracker. Eight male and eight female subjects free of eye disease participated in the experiment. The experiment was conducted using a 2 × 3 within-subject design. The book type (e-book, paper book) and font size (8 pt, 10 pt, 12 pt) were independent variables, and fixation duration time, saccade length, blink rate and subjective discomfort were dependent variables. In the results, all dependent variables showed that reading paper books provided a better experience than reading e-books did. These results indicate that the legibility of e-books needs further improvement, considering fixation duration time, saccade movement, eye fatigue, device and so on. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: This study evaluated the legibility difference between e-books and paper books from the viewpoint of readability, eye fatigue and subjective discomfort by using an eye tracker. The results showed that paper books provided a better experience than e-books. This indicates that the readability of e-books needs further improvement in relation to paper books.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
回答优先基于摘要、文献信息与可获取全文;依据不足时会明确说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology · Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
参考文献 19
此处列出前 3 条
施引文献 13
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条