A systematic review of engineering practice in K-12 STEM studies
Natalie Kidd, Kok‐Sing Tang, Kuen‐Yi Lin
Curtin University National Taiwan Normal University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Background Engineering in K-12 STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education is increasingly emphasised for its role in providing authentic contexts and enhancing student engagement and interest in STEM fields.Purpose This paper presents a systematic literature review of empirical research on engineering experiences within K-12 STEM education, aiming to assess the characteristics of these studies and the focus of engineering practices.Sample The review analysed 38 peer-reviewed journal articles from the Web of Science database. These articles, published between 2013 and 2023, met the following inclusion criteria: journal articles, empirical studies of STEM projects and K-12 education with a focus on engineering.Design and methods A systematic search and review process following the PRISMA method was employed to identify studies documenting engineering experiences in K-12 education. The selection criteria aimed to capture a wide range of engineering practices and their impact on STEM education at the K-12 level.Results Findings reveal an emphasis on design-based tasks and challenges central to engineering practices in K-12 STEM education. These include a focus on problem-solving skills and tasks and engineering design processes. Engineering tool use considered epistemic to the disciplines varied, with prototyping and model building identified as the most frequently utilised. The study offers a comprehensive perspective on engineering practices in K-12 STEM education, highlighting the importance of such practices in enhancing the quality of STEM education.Conclusion By providing insights into engineering practices, this review supports educators and researchers in improving the representation of engineering within K-12 STEM curricula, aiming to ensure a sound foundation for future STEM learners.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Science Education and Pedagogy
Design Education and Practice · Engineering Education and Pedagogy