Mapping out the landscape of literature on assessment in engineering education
Jonathan Grant Halls, Carmen Tomás, John S. Owen, Kamel Hawwash
University of Nottingham University of Birmingham
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Over recent decades, literature on assessment in higher education has intensified generating a wealth of frameworks to inform practice. Generic frameworks for assessment practice are sometimes perceived as missing subject-specific considerations. This literature review proposes to (a) map the current landscape of assessment in engineering education and to (b) help drive the field forwards by identifying elements of assessment that require discipline-specific consideration as a foundation to formulate good practice. Sources were identified using a broad set of keywords related to assessment in engineering education. Inclusion criteria considered papers about university-level education and were published, in English, between 2012 and 2018. The review establishes that much literature has focused on design, accreditation and marking with much less literature on key concerns in practice such as workplace assessment, student engagement and programme level design. Based on the results, recommendations are made for research areas where greater focus is needed to advance further engineering specific insights.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Student Assessment and Feedback · Engineering Education and Pedagogy