Financialization and assetization: Assets as sites of financial power struggles
Philipp Golka, Natascha van der Zwan, Arjen van der Heide
Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Leiden University University of Applied Sciences Leiden Netherlands Institute for Social Research
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Despite significant overlap, scholarship often distinguishes the concepts of financialization and assetization. While there are historical, ontological and conceptual reasons for this distinction, we argue that this may limit both perspectives’ analytical potential. In this paper, we develop a shared research agenda that brings together analytical strengths and core insights of both perspectives. We propose to use three notions of financial power developed in financialization scholarship – instrumental, structural and infrastructural power – and apply them to different sites of power struggles that are linked to the asset form: the challenge to create durable returns, the challenge to calculate and distribute risks, and the distribution of wider societal power relations linked to the control of larger asset classes. We illustrate the proposed perspective in three vignettes on topics pertinent to scholars working within both strands of literature: green and impact assets, asset management and housing.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Housing Market and Economics · Community Development and Social Impact
参考文献 99
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 46
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条