Teachers’ perspectives on AI integration in K-12 education: challenges, opportunities, and preliminary assessment model – a systematic review
Mohd Kashif, Mohammad Ammar, Abdellatif Sellami, Thomas K.F. Chiu, Saddam Akber Abbasi, Z. Ahmad
Qatar University Chinese University of Hong Kong
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into K-12 education holds significant promise for transforming teaching and learning processes. Central to this transformation are teachers’ perspectives, which play a key role in shaping the adoption and effective use of AI technologies in classrooms. Existing literature has not systematically synthesized these perspectives through the lens of well-established theoretical frameworks, nor developed structured models to guide evaluation efforts. To address these gaps, this study applies constructs from the UTAUT and TPACK frameworks to guide a thematic synthesis of findings, with the aim of identifying enabling and constraining factors influencing AI integration in K-12 education from the standpoint of educators. The review process followed PRISMA guidelines to ensure rigorous and systematic literature selection and analysis. Findings suggest that teachers generally exhibit a blend of optimism and cautious concern regarding the adoption of AI in K-12 education. We identified three critical factors as particularly influential: teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), teacher agency, and teacher affective orientations. In response to the complexities of implementation, we propose a novel preliminary assessment model, guided by the evaluative principles of UNESCO’s Global Education Monitoring Report 2023. The proposed model offers a practice-grounded application of global policy dimensions: Equity, Sustainability, Appropriateness, and Scalability, linked with synthesized classroom-level insights. It further delineates ten essential subthemes, providing a structured approach for evaluating the effectiveness of AI integration in educational settings.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AITeaching and Learning Programming
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Online Learning and Analytics
参考文献 68
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 5
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条