From ‘data-driven’ to ‘data-informed’ design — grounding AI for design in knowledge, context and decisions
Roger J. Jiao
Georgia Institute of Technology
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Engineering design is increasingly influenced by abundant data and advances in machine learning, yet the common narrative of “data-driven design” mischaracterizes how design knowledge works. Unlike perception-focused AI domains that rely on large labeled datasets and stable mappings, engineering design is data sparse, knowledge rich, decision centric, and context dependent. This article reframes AI for design as data informed rather than data driven, arguing that effective decisions require integrating knowledge, constraints, mechanisms, semantics, and evolving intent, which data alone cannot supply. Drawing on the classical Data-Information-Knowledge (DIK) hierarchy, the article proposes three first principles for grounding AI in design: (i) DIK distinction, preserving the differences between raw data, processed information, and actionable knowledge; (ii) Domain problems, emphasizing alignment with domain objectives, constraints, and causal mechanisms; and (iii) Design context, embedding AI within the interpretive, intent-laden nature of design reasoning. An operational framework and end-to-end pipeline are introduced to align AI tools with decision needs, avoid dataset-first framing, and evaluate systems by decision quality rather than predictive accuracy. Positioning data as evidence rather than authority, the article shows how elevating contextual grounding, feasibility logic, and designer intent enables AI to move beyond pattern recognition and support rigorous, interpretable, knowledge-aligned design decisions.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Design Education and Practice
参考文献 15
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 7
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条